Maxime Huyghe (Univ. Lille, Inria, CNRS, UMR 9189 CRIStAL), Clément Quinton (Univ. Lille, Inria, CNRS, UMR 9189 CRIStAL), Walter Rudametkin (Univ. Rennes, Inria, CNRS, UMR 6074 IRISA)

Web browsers have become complex tools used by billions of people. The complexity is in large part due to its adaptability and variability as a deployment platform for modern applications, with features continuously being added. This also has the side effect of exposing configuration and hardware properties that are exploited by browser fingerprinting techniques.

In this paper, we generate a large dataset of browser fingerprints using multiple browser versions, system and hardware configurations, and describe a tool that allows reasoning over the links between configuration parameters and browser fingerprints. We argue that using generated datasets that exhaustively explore configurations provides developers, and attackers, with important information related to the links between configuration parameters (i.e., browser, system and hardware configurations) and their exhibited browser fingerprints. We also exploit Browser Object Model (BOM) enumeration to obtain exhaustive browser fingerprints composed of up to 16, 000 attributes.

We propose to represent browser fingerprints and their configurations with feature models, a tree-based representation commonly used in Software Product Line Engineering (SPLE) to respond to the challenges of variability, to provide a better abstraction to represent browser fingerprints and configurations. With translate 89, 486 browser fingerprints into a feature model with 35, 857 nodes from 1, 748 configurations. We show the advantages of this approach, a more elegant tree-based solution, and propose an API to query the dataset. With these tools and our exhaustive configuration exploration, we provide multiple use cases, including differences between headless and headful browsers or the selection of a minimal set of attributes from browser fingerprints to re-identify a configuration parameter from the browser.

View More Papers

Careful About What App Promotion Ads Recommend! Detecting and...

Shang Ma (University of Notre Dame), Chaoran Chen (University of Notre Dame), Shao Yang (Case Western Reserve University), Shifu Hou (University of Notre Dame), Toby Jia-Jun Li (University of Notre Dame), Xusheng Xiao (Arizona State University), Tao Xie (Peking University), Yanfang Ye (University of Notre Dame)

Read More

SCAMMAGNIFIER: Piercing the Veil of Fraudulent Shopping Website Campaigns

Marzieh Bitaab (Arizona State University), Alireza Karimi (Arizona State University), Zhuoer Lyu (Arizona State University), Adam Oest (Amazon), Dhruv Kuchhal (Amazon), Muhammad Saad (X Corp.), Gail-Joon Ahn (Arizona State University), Ruoyu Wang (Arizona State University), Tiffany Bao (Arizona State University), Yan Shoshitaishvili (Arizona State University), Adam Doupé (Arizona State University)

Read More

Privacy-Enhancing Technologies Against Physical-Layer and Link-Layer Device Tracking: Trends,...

Apolline Zehner (Universite libre de Bruxelles), Iness Ben Guirat (Universite libre de Bruxelles), Jan Tobias Muhlberg (Universite libre de Bruxelles)

Read More

The Kids Are All Right: Investigating the Susceptibility of...

Elijah Bouma-Sims (Carnegie Mellon University), Lily Klucinec (Carnegie Mellon University), Mandy Lanyon (Carnegie Mellon University), Julie Downs (Carnegie Mellon University), Lorrie Faith Cranor (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More